Cognitive Digital Twins for Climate-Resilient Building Energy Systems: Diagnosis-Informed Control under Extreme Thermal Stress

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65582/aifsc.2026.005

Keywords:

Cognitive Digital Twin; Building Energy Systems; Climate Resilience; Performance Drift Diagnosis; Diagnosis-informed Control; Intelligent HVAC Operation.

Abstract

Climate change is increasingly exposing building energy systems to prolonged and severe thermal stress, revealing fundamental limitations in conventional control strategies that rely on static models and reactive feedback. Under extreme heatwave conditions, buildings often experience gradual performance drift driven by equipment degradation, sensing bias, and evolving internal loads, leading to declining energy efficiency and growing thermal discomfort. Existing control architectures, however, lack the capability to interpret the underlying causes of these deviations or to adapt their operation in a timely and causally informed manner. This study proposes a cognitive digital twin framework that shifts building energy management from reactive regulation toward diagnosis-informed and adaptive control under climate-extreme operation. The framework integrates physics-based building energy modeling with real-time sensing and data assimilation to enable continuous state estimation, early detection of performance drift, and explicit root-cause attribution. Diagnostic information is embedded directly within the control loop, allowing control actions to be conditioned on diagnosed system states rather than solely on predictive trajectories or residual-based feedback. In this formulation, cognition emerges from the closed-loop interaction of interpretation, reasoning, and memory as operating conditions evolve. The framework is evaluated using a representative medium-scale commercial office building equipped with a variable air volume HVAC system and subjected to structured heatwave-driven stress scenarios, including progressive cooling capacity degradation, sensor temperature drift, demand response constraints, occupancy shocks, and elevated operational uncertainty. Simulations are conducted across hot-dry, hot-humid, and temperate climates to assess robustness and generalizability. Compared with rule-based control, conventional model predictive control, and a non-cognitive digital twin baseline, the proposed approach reduces energy use intensity by 10.9%, peak electric demand by 13.4%, and discomfort hours by 54.6% under climate-extreme conditions. Performance drift is detected 3.3–3.4× earlier, unmet cooling hours are reduced by 58.2%, and post-event comfort recovery is accelerated by approximately 46%. These results demonstrate that cognitive digital twins can function as self-interpreting and adaptive building energy systems, providing a scalable and resilient pathway for sustaining energy performance and thermal comfort under increasingly uncertain and climate-stressed environments.

References

AlBalkhy, W., Karmaoui, D., Ducoulombier, L., Lafhaj, Z. and Linner, T., 2024. Digital twins in the built environment: Definition, applications, and challenges. Automation in Construction, 162, 105368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105368.

Chen, J., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Shi, Y., Gao, X. and Hu, Y., 2022. A review of computing-based automated fault detection and diagnosis of heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112395.

Crawley, D.B., Lawrie, L.K., Winkelmann, F.C., Buhl, W.F., Huang, Y.J., Pedersen, C.O., Strand, R.K., Liesen, R.J., Fisher, D.E., Witte, M.J. and Glazer, J., 2001. EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33(4), 319–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00114-6.

de Dear, R.J. and Brager, G.S., 2002. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00005-1.

Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Figueroa, I.C., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Perarnau Ollé, E., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D.L. and Helsen, L., 2020. All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings. Annual Reviews in Control, 50, 190–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001.

Du, Z. and Jin, X., 2007. Detection and diagnosis for sensor fault in HVAC systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 48(3), 693–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.09.023.

Du, Z., Jin, X. and Wu, L., 2007. Fault detection and diagnosis based on improved PCA with JAA method in VAV systems. Building and Environment, 42(9), 3221–3232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.011.

Ejenakevwe, K.A., Xie, L., Wang, J., Hurt, R. and Song, L., 2025. An automated framework based on RC model and GA optimization for calibrating coupled residential buildings and HVAC systems. Building and Environment, 283, 113368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113368.

Gavaldà-Torrellas, O., Monsalvete, P., Ranjbar, S. and Eicker, U., 2025. The urban building energy retrofitting tool: An open-source framework to help foster building retrofitting using a life cycle costing perspective—First results for Montréal. Smart Cities, 8(1), 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8010017.

Giuzio, G.F., Russo, G., Cipolla, G., Pompei, L., Stasi, R. and Buonomano, A., 2025. User-centric urban energy modelling: A reduced order model approach based on pre-calibrated archetypes dataset. Energy and Buildings, 339, 115768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115768.

Hodavand, F., Ramaji, I.J. and Sadeghi, N., 2023. Digital twin for fault detection and diagnosis of building operations: A systematic review. Buildings, 13(6), 1426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061426.

Hodavand, F., Ramaji, I., Sadeghi, N. and Zandi Goharrizi, S., 2025. Digital twin-enabled framework for intelligent monitoring and anomaly detection in multi-zone building systems. Buildings, 15(22), 4030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224030.

Hosamo, H.H., Nielsen, H.K., Alnmr, A.N., Svennevig, P.R. and Svidt, K., 2022. A review of the digital twin technology for fault detection in buildings. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8, 1013196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1013196.

ISO/IEC 30173:2023, “Digital twin — Concepts and terminology,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.

Katipamula, S. and Brambley, M.R., 2005. Methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systems—A review, Part I. HVAC&R Research, 11(1), 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2005.10391123.

Lee, K.-H. and Braun, J.E., 2008a. Evaluation of methods for determining demand-limiting setpoint trajectories in buildings using short-term measurements. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1769–1783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.003.

Lee, K.-H. and Braun, J.E., 2008b. Development of methods for determining demand-limiting setpoint trajectories in buildings using short-term measurements. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1755–1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.004.

Liu, Y., Ji, T., Guo, X., Xu, X. and Polzer, J., 2025. Cognitive digital twin frameworks in manufacturing: A critical survey, evaluation criteria, and future directions. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 83, 597–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.10.004.

Lu, Q., Xie, X., Parlikad, A.K. and Schooling, J.M., 2020. Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance. Automation in Construction, 118, 103277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103277.

Maturo, A., Vallianos, C., Delcroix, B., Buonomano, A. and Athienitis, A., 2024. Automated model order reduction for building thermal load prediction using smart thermostats data. Journal of Building Engineering, 96, 110492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110492.

Melgaard, S.P., Andersen, K.H., Marszal-Pomianowska, A., Jensen, R.L. and Heiselberg, P.K., 2022. Fault detection and diagnosis encyclopedia for building systems: A systematic review. Energies, 15(12), 4366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124366.

Naderi, S., Pignatta, G., Heslop, S., MacGill, I. and Chen, D., 2022. Demand response via pre-cooling and solar pre-cooling: A review. Energy and Buildings, 272, 112340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112340.

Nguyen, A.-T., Reiter, S. and Rigo, P., 2014. A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113, 1043–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.061.

Osama, Z., 2024. The digital twin framework: A roadmap to the development of user-centred digital twin in the built environment. Journal of Building Engineering, 98, 111081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111081.

Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J. and Pout, C., 2008. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Buildings, 40(3), 394–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007.

Santamouris, M., Cartalis, C., Synnefa, A. and Kolokotsa, D., 2015. On the impact of urban heat island and global warming on the power demand and electricity consumption of buildings—A review. Energy and Buildings, 98, 119–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.052.

Shi, Z. and O’Brien, W., 2019. Sequential state prediction and parameter estimation with constrained dual extended Kalman filter for building zone thermal responses. Energy and Buildings, 183, 538–546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.024.

Subramanian, A.S.R., Gundersen, T. and Adams II, T.A., 2018. Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review. Processes, 6(12), 238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6120238.

Sun, Y., Wang, S., Xiao, F. and Huang, G., 2012. A study of pre-cooling impacts on peak demand limiting in commercial buildings. HVAC&R Research, 18(6), 1098–1111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2012.672361.

Tuhaise, V.V., Tah, J.H.M. and Abanda, F.H., 2023. Technologies for digital twin applications in construction. Automation in Construction, 152, 104931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104931.

Wang, J., Wei, Z., Zhu, Y., Zheng, C., Li, B. and Zhai, X., 2023. Demand response via optimal pre-cooling combined with temperature reset strategy for air conditioning system: A case study of office building. Energy, 282, 128751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128751.

Wang, S. and Xiao, F., 2004. Detection and diagnosis of AHU sensor faults using principal component analysis method. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(17), 2667–2686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.12.008.

Xie, X., Merino, J., Moretti, N., Pauwels, P., Chang, J.Y. and Parlikad, A., 2023. Digital twin enabled fault detection and diagnosis process for building HVAC systems. Automation in Construction, 146, 104695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104695.

Zhang, R. and Hong, T., 2017. Modeling of HVAC operational faults in building performance simulation. Applied Energy, 202, 178–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.153.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Samaei, S. R., & Riffat, J. (2026). Cognitive Digital Twins for Climate-Resilient Building Energy Systems: Diagnosis-Informed Control under Extreme Thermal Stress. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Cities, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.65582/aifsc.2026.005

Issue

Section

Technical Articles